• Dr. Muqtedar Khan
  • About Ijtihad
  • Articles on Islam
  • Academic Publications
  • Foreign Languages
  • World Politics
  • Videos
    • Islam
    • Politics
  • Contact
BREAKING NEWS
Imagining a ‘New India’ without Muslims
Global Perspectives: US-Israel War on Iran
The Church of San Cataldo in Palermo
Ongoing Realtime Analysis of the Israel and US War on Iran By Muqtedar Khan
The Collapse of the Western Alliance with Ambassador Talmiz Ahmad
Pakistan’s Revival Should Worry India
Reclaiming Gandhian Spirituality in the Age of Religious Nationalism
Has Donald Trump Upended India’s Grand Strategy?
Zohran Mamdani for Mayor of New York City
Bangladesh and Pakistan Are Changing South Asia’s Geopolitical Landscape  
India’s Grand Strategy | India’s claim of pursuing ‘strategic autonomy’ in its foreign policy is a facade
Modi 3.0: Continuity in Policy and Prejudice
Why Ibn Khaldun Still Matters
Ibn Khaldun Center for Public Policy
Indian Muslims in Peril: What Can American Muslims Do?

Shariah law banned in Oklahoma

Posted On Nov 03 2010
By : Dr. Muqtedar Khan
Comment: 0

Oklahoma’s State Question 755, which prohibits state judges from resorting to International Law or the Shariah Law while passing judgments has been passed by an overwhelming margin – 76% Yes, 24% No.

In trying to ban Islamic law from encroaching into Oklahoma, the voters have in effect banned an important provision of the US Constitution itself. I shall demonstrate in the following paragraphs.

The proposition to amend the Oklahoma constitution was authored by StateRepresentative Rex Duncan, a Republican, who has a history of religious bigotry. He tried to ban the headscarf from driver’s licenses and refuses to take the Quran as a gift. His motivation to ban Shariah law, according to him a pre-emptive strike, stems from the fear that some judges are allowing out of court settlements and arbitration that allows Muslims (usually in divorce cases) to come to an understanding based on their religious beliefs.

Critics of Shariah in Oklahoma argue that they also oppose the Shariah law because it is against freedom of religion. In this age, when ignorance and bigotry are being celebrated in America, I am sure that most people in Oklahoma must have missed the irony in the situation.

The key sentence in the State question 755 is: It forbids courts from considering or using international law. It forbids courts from considering or using Shariah Law. The proposition also bans international law. To consider how ignorant both the authors and the voters of the proposition are, please take a look at Article Six, Section I, Clause II of the US constitution. It is called the supremacy clause.

According to this clause, international treaties to which the U.S. government is a signatory become “the supreme law of the land”. Treaties, along with custom and UN declarations are the main sources of international law (the proposition 755 actually mentions it). Thus by rejecting international law the proposition designed to institutionalize Islamophobia in Oklahoma, has effectually said “thanks, but no thanks” to the U.S. Constitution.

About the Author
Dr. M. A. Muqtedar Khan is Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at University of Delaware.
  • google-share
Previous Story

The theology of a homegrown terrorist and the problem of citizenship

Next Story

WikiLeaks exposes Muslim nations’ hypocrisy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest Articles

Imagining a ‘New India’ without Muslims

Global Perspectives: US-Israel War on Iran

The Church of San Cataldo in Palermo

MOST POPULAR

Prophet Muhammad's Promise to Christians

No Responses.

Islam, Hinduism and Truth

No Responses.

Ibn Rushd the King Philosopher

No Responses.

American Muslims should welcome same-sex marriage ruling

No Responses.

What is Independent Thinking?

No Responses.
Copyright 2014 Muqtedar Khan. All Right Reserved. Powered by Creative Studio.