GlocalEye 
Muqtedar Khan's Column  on Global Affairs 


Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Director of International Studies and Chair, Political Science Department at Adrian College in Michigan.  

Dr. Khan is a Non-Resident Fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington DC.
 
He earned his Ph.D. in International Relations, Political Philosophy, and Islamic Political Thought,  from Georgetown University in May 2000.

Dr. Khan is also associated with the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy and the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

He is the author of American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom (Amana, 2002), Jihad for Jerusalem: Identity and Strategy in International Relations (Praeger, 2004). His forthcoming book is titled Beyond Jihad and Crusade: Rethinking US Policy in the Muslim World (Brookings Institution, 2004).

Dr. Khan frequently comments on BBC, CNN, FOX and VOA TV, NPR and other radio networks. His political commentaries appear regularly in newspapers in over 20 countries.  He has also lectured in North America, East Asia, Middle East and Europe.

Dr. Khan's column has appeared in  The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Newsweek (Arabic), New York Post, Newsday, Arizona Tribune, Duluth News Tribune, The Daily Telegraph (London), The Daily Star (Lebanon), The Daily Times (Pakistan), Dawn (Pakistan), Q-News (UK), Al Ahram weekly (Egypt), Hindustan Times (India), Outlook India, The Sun (UK), Jakarta Post, Jordan Times, Manila Times, Outlook India, Palestine Times, Calgary Herald, The Daily Telegram (MI), San Francisco Chronicle, Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, The Muslim Democrat, The Christian Century, Islamic Horizons, The Message, TheGlobalist.com, Progressive.org,  fpif.org,  Beliefnet.com, Arabies Trends, Al-Mustaqbal, Saudi Gazette, and many other periodicals world wide.

For a comprehensive resume click here:   Resume



American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom

NEW BOOK:
Jihad for Jerusalem

Recent Articles on GlocalEye

Iraqi Elections: Have the Iraqis voted for a Dictatorship of ayatollah Al-Sistani?

Prospects for Peace: Palestinian Leadership After Arafat

Passion for Palestine: 
The Unfinished Saga of Yasser Arafat

The Rise of Political Christianity

Foreign Policy Forecast: 
If Bush Wins | If Kerry Wins

American Muslim Taskforce Insults John Kerry and alienates George Bush

9-11 Commission Report: An Entrée' for American Muslims in the Policy Process

 How George Bush Changed America

The Remarkable Moderation of Detroit Muslims

The Role of Social Scientists in Muslim Societies

Saudi Arabia: Rethinking its Soul

Come November Al Qaeda will vote for George W. Bush

American Muslims and 
the Politics of Block Voting

Let the Elections be about the Future of the Free Society

The Politics and the Promise of Civilizational Dialogues:

Globalization and Terrorism

The Myth of Secularism:

Liberal Islam, Radical Islam and American Foreign Policy


TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION 
OF NEW ARTICLES 

geye.jpg (7681 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION 
OF NEW ARTICLES 

Religious, Secular Divide 
Arafat’s Religious Legacy

By M. A. Muqtedar Khan

Science and Theology News | January 25, 2005

Yasser Arafat’s legacy to Palestine, though he is the father of Palestinian nationalism and the last hero of the struggle for decolonization, is complicated.

It is easy to understand his political legacy: a dream unfinished. He has left behind a nation on the threshold of nationhood. But he has also left behind chaos, confusion, bloodshed, despair, anger and people without established leaders and without enduring institutions. While nationalism can be sustained through rhetoric and passion, nation states cannot be built in vacuum.

What is difficult to decipher is his religious legacy. Arafat was a secular leader, but he did not hesitate to use Islam to advance his political causes whenever convenient. Although he launched the Fatah movement for Palestinian Liberation in 1959, it was only after the Israeli annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967 that it began to capture Muslim thought.

Linking Jerusalem, a profoundly holy city for Muslims, with the Palestinian struggle has given the cause a particularly special, and even sacred, place in the Muslim psyche. Arafat, though inspired by leftist liberation ideologies, did not hesitate to use the loss of Jerusalem to attract sympathy and support from Muslims who initially saw the Palestinian cause as an Arab-Israeli affair.

After Arafat’s death, Palestinians wanted to bury him in Jerusalem, near the Noble Sanctuary. The Israeli government did not allow it, fearing his burial in East Jerusalem would give the city additional symbolic value for the Palestinians. Instead, he was buried in his headquarters in Ramallah. Palestinians, however, are hopeful that once the Palestinian state is established with East Jerusalem as its capital, Arafat’s remains will be moved to his family gravesite there. If so, his legacy will be tied to the glory of the Noble Sanctuary, perhaps forever.

Arafat died in the month of Ramadán, which carries deep religious and spiritual significance for Muslims. To die in this month is considered a special blessing from Allah. As time passes, and Muslims reflect on Arafat’s life from some distance and with greater compassion, this fact will play an important role in enhancing his station in Muslim and Arab history.

Arafat’s life can be summed as one of great successes and great failures. His greatest success is the fact that the Palestinian cause has become one of the most important global political issues; global peace is not possible without the resolution of the Palestinian crisis. Much of the credit for sustaining and globalizing Palestinian nationalism for more than half a century must go to Arafat. However, he failed to bring the struggle to fruition and failed to demonstrate democratic and effective leadership when he became the president of the Palestinian Authority.

Arafat’s most enduring failure may be his inability to keep the Palestinian struggle united. With the rise of Islamic movements and militias, the Palestinian struggle has split into Islamic and non-Islamic struggle. Over the years, Hamas has managed to develop a strong constituency for itself, completely independent of Arafat’s influence. While some may point out that perhaps Arafat allowed Hamas to grow in order to create a good-cop bad-cop scenario to deal with Israel, the ramifications of this split could cause, and perhaps already have caused a rift in the Palestinian society that may not be healed, even after a Palestinian state emerges and Palestinians become free.

Once that society does emerge, it is safe to assume that Islamic groups will demand a share in governance and probably the “Islamization” of the new state, which would be under international pressure to remain secular and democratic. The secular-Islamic split in the Palestinian society will be the greatest religious impact of Arafat’s legacy.

____________________________________________________

Related Articles

Prospects for Peace: Palestinian Leadership After Arafat

Passion for Palestine: 
The Unfinished Saga of Yasser Arafat


First Establish the Will to Peace -Then chart the Way to Peace

 Re-Imagining Jerusalem: One Faith-One City

New Book by  
Muqtedar Khan



Jihad for Jerusalem


geye.jpg (7681 bytes)