|

|
Dr.
Muqtedar Khan is Director of International Studies and Chair, Political
Science Department at Adrian College in Michigan.
Dr. Khan is a Non-Resident Fellow at the Brookings Institution in
Washington DC.
He earned his Ph.D. in International Relations, Political Philosophy, and
Islamic Political Thought, from Georgetown University in May 2000.
Dr. Khan is
also associated with the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy and
the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.
He is the
author of American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom (Amana, 2002),
Jihad for Jerusalem: Identity and Strategy in International Relations
(Praeger, 2004). His forthcoming book is titled Beyond Jihad and Crusade:
Rethinking US Policy in the Muslim World (Brookings Institution, 2004).
Dr. Khan
frequently comments on BBC, CNN, FOX and VOA TV, NPR and other radio
networks. His political commentaries appear regularly in newspapers in
over 20 countries. He has also lectured in North America, East Asia,
Middle East and Europe.
Dr. Khan's column has appeared in The New York Times, The
Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Newsweek (Arabic), New
York Post, Newsday, Arizona Tribune, Duluth News Tribune, The Daily
Telegraph (London), The Daily Star (Lebanon), The Daily Times (Pakistan),
Dawn (Pakistan), Q-News (UK), Al Ahram weekly (Egypt), Hindustan Times
(India), Outlook India, The Sun (UK), Jakarta Post, Jordan Times, Manila
Times, Outlook India, Palestine Times, Calgary Herald, The Daily Telegram
(MI), San Francisco Chronicle, Detroit Free Press, Detroit News,
Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, The Muslim Democrat, The
Christian Century, Islamic Horizons, The Message, TheGlobalist.com,
Progressive.org, fpif.org, Beliefnet.com, Arabies Trends,
Al-Mustaqbal, Saudi Gazette, and many other periodicals world wide.
For a
comprehensive resume click here: Resume
American
Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom

NEW
BOOK:
Jihad
for Jerusalem
Recent
Articles on GlocalEye
Iraqi
Elections: Have the Iraqis voted for a Dictatorship of ayatollah
Al-Sistani?
Prospects
for Peace: Palestinian Leadership After Arafat
Passion
for Palestine:
The Unfinished Saga of Yasser Arafat
The
Rise of Political Christianity
Foreign
Policy Forecast:
If Bush Wins | If Kerry Wins
American
Muslim Taskforce Insults John Kerry and alienates George Bush
9-11
Commission Report: An Entrée' for American Muslims in the Policy Process
How
George Bush Changed America
The
Remarkable Moderation of Detroit Muslims
The
Role of Social Scientists in Muslim Societies
Saudi
Arabia: Rethinking its Soul
Come
November Al
Qaeda will vote for George W. Bush
American
Muslims and
the Politics of Block Voting
Let
the Elections be about the Future of the Free Society
The
Politics and the Promise of Civilizational Dialogues:
Globalization
and Terrorism
The
Myth of Secularism:
Liberal
Islam, Radical Islam and American Foreign Policy
|
TO
RECEIVE NOTIFICATION
OF NEW ARTICLES

|

|
|
Are
Pakistanis Less Prejudiced than Indians?
Muqtedar Khan | March
29, 2005
I
was disappointed to read that when
Pakistan
beat
India
in
a Cricket match this week in
Bangalore
they were
rewarded with silence
by thousands of cricket fans in the stadium. In contrast when India
beat Pakistan in Karachi the crowds there
roared with approval for the Indian team’s excellent performance.
One recurrent theme of
India
’s tour to
Pakistan
was the
great welcome they received, the hospitality of the locals and the general
love and adulation
that Indian team received in
Pakistan
across the
board. The silence in
Bangalore
in contrast
seemed shameful.
India
is a democracy and given its long history of religious pluralism it is a
surprise that when it comes to respecting the other for its excellence
India, at least Bangalore, is found less than equal to Pakistan.
I do not wish to make too much out of this singular event, the poor
Bangaloreans were already stupefied by the declining batting prowess of
the Indian captain Ganguly [who aggregated 48 in his last 5 innings], but
I think that the silence in Bangalore is indicative of how nationalism
undermines good nature, in this case sportsmanship.
An
Indian visitor to Pakistan last year wrote [Business Line April 05, 2004]:
"It
was an overwhelming experience at
Karachi
's National Stadium where the Pakistanis were throwing chocolates at the
Indian fans cheering their team. Quite a few were carrying the flags of
both countries imaginatively stitched together. The guy on the street
selling bhuttas refused to accept money from us and so did some
restaurant owners saying that we were their guests!"
She was amazed by people on the streets wanting to shake the hands of
Indian visitors and "asking us to come home for dinner. Everybody we
met had some relative staying in India. Star Plus is Karachi's most favorite
channel. Shops gave us 40 to 50 per cent discount and again it was the
India factor. Taxis, autos, army guys... the list is endless... everywhere
we got loads of courtesy and respect; more than we would get in our own
country. It is really sad that we consider ourselves `secular' and yet
have such a negative perception of Pakistan."
An
article in The Telegraph [March 06, 2005] reported:
|
Almost each of
the 8,000 Indians who went to Pakistan for the 2004 cricket series
had a story to tell — of a shop-keeper who wouldn’t take
money, a taxi-driver who refused the fare and the perfect stranger
who called them home for dinner. |

The stories about Pakistani
hospitality to the Indian cricket team and the thousands of Indian fans proliferated
in the media last year. I hardly see any such reports this time. I hope
many Pakistani tourists too will go back with similar appreciation of
Indian hospitality.
Even as the series began Indian media
was observing that Pakistanis would not be received with the same
sentiments as Indians were in Pakistan. Sen
and Mahapatra write in The Telegraph, that according to Ali, a
restaurant owner in Calcutta, Pakistanis would not be received with the
same fervor because Indians lacked the heart and guts to do so ["Kaleja
nahin hai" he said]
How should we understand this
disparity in the conduct of Pakistanis towards Indians and of Indians
towards Pakistanis? Are Pakistanis less prejudiced than Indians or are
they more capable of rising above hatred and mutual distrust? Does
this comparison suggest that the Wahhabi teachings supposedly so
widespread in Pakistan are no match to the Hindutva capacity to sow hatred
among Indians.
Pakistanis who live in a supposedly
non-secular, non-democratic society do not fear to show that they are fans
of Indian cricket as well as Indian hockey teams and Indian movie
stars. But apparently in secular and democratic India, to show
appreciation for Pakistan is a potential act of treason, one could be labeled
a spy!
Amin, a Kashmiri exporter settled in Calcutta
says: “There’s no such thing as a Pakistani fan. All
Pakistani fans are spies,”.
It is a shame that in
the new, more confident, more successful India, nationalism and
communalism are depriving people of basic values such as hospitality often
associated strongly with Indian culture. In recent years Indian nationalism
has used the portrayal of Pakistan as the enemy as a way to explain many
Indian problems and to provide a justification and cover for the rising
Hindutva movement and its egregious anti-Muslim politics. Indian
movies, the electoral discourses, media are proliferated with articles
about Pakistan's hand behind everything from Godhra to Kashmir. This
culture of blaming Pakistan for all of India's problems and the deep
seated hatred and intolerance which often does not distinguish between
Pakistanis and Indian Muslims may one day cause a terrible holocaust in India
which will make the genocide in Gujarat 2002 look like a picnic.
____________________________________________________
|